Physicochemical Properties
| Molecular Formula | C19H26CL2N2O |
| Molecular Weight | 369.33 |
| Exact Mass | 404.119 |
| CAS # | 67198-17-8 |
| Related CAS # | (1R,2R)-U-50488 hydrochloride;109620-49-7;(-)-U-50488 hydrochloride;114528-79-9;(±)-U-50488 hydrochloride;67197-96-0;(±)-U-50488 hydrate hydrochloride;(+)-U-50488 hydrochloride;114528-81-3 |
| PubChem CID | 19872097 |
| Appearance | Typically exists as solid at room temperature |
| LogP | 5.141 |
| Hydrogen Bond Donor Count | 1 |
| Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count | 2 |
| Rotatable Bond Count | 4 |
| Heavy Atom Count | 25 |
| Complexity | 428 |
| Defined Atom Stereocenter Count | 0 |
| SMILES | CN(C1CCCCC1N2CCCC2)C(=O)CC3=CC(=C(C=C3)Cl)Cl.Cl |
| InChi Key | KGMMGVIYOHGOKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| InChi Code | InChI=1S/C19H26Cl2N2O.ClH/c1-22(19(24)13-14-8-9-15(20)16(21)12-14)17-6-2-3-7-18(17)23-10-4-5-11-23;/h8-9,12,17-18H,2-7,10-11,13H2,1H3;1H |
| Chemical Name | 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-(2-pyrrolidin-1-ylcyclohexyl)acetamide;hydrochloride |
| Synonyms | 67198-17-8; (+/-)-U-50488 hydrochloride; (+)-U-50488Hydrochloride; 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-(2-pyrrolidin-1-ylcyclohexyl)acetamide;hydrochloride; 67198-19-0; SCHEMBL7115845; 3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclo-hexyl] benzeneacetamide hydrochloride |
| HS Tariff Code | 2934.99.9001 |
| Storage |
Powder-20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month |
| Shipping Condition | Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs) |
Biological Activity
| Targets | kappa-opioid receptor/KOR( Kd = 2.2 nM); μ-opioid receptor/MOR (Kd = 430 nM) |
| ln Vitro |
(+)-U-50488 (hydrochloride) (+)-Trans-(1R,2R)-U-50488 hydrochloride) is the (-)-Trans-(1S,2S)-U-50488[1] enantiomer. The enantiomers of U50,488, ligands highly selective for kappa-opioid receptors, have been prepared by a refined procedure and their optical purity demonstrated. The absolute configuration of (+)-trans-2-pyrrolidinyl-N-methylcyclohexylamine, a chemically versatile intermediate for synthesis of analogs of kappa-opioid receptor ligands with defined chirality, has been determined to be 1S,2S by X-ray crystallographic analysis. This intermediate has been used to synthesize the optically pure U50,488 enantiomers with known absolute configuration[2]. |
| References |
[1]. Synthesis and absolute configuration of optically pure enantiomers of a kappa-opioid receptor selective agonist. FEBS Lett. 1987;223(2):335-339. |
| Additional Infomation | Purpose: A detailed review on the chemistry and pharmacology of non-fentanil novel synthetic opioid receptor agonists, particularly N-substituted benzamides and acetamides (known colloquially as U-drugs) and 4-aminocyclohexanols, developed at the Upjohn Company in the 1970s and 1980s is presented. Method: Peer-reviewed literature, patents, professional literature, data from international early warning systems and drug user fora discussion threads have been used to track their emergence as substances of abuse. Results: In terms of impact on drug markets, prevalence and harm, the most significant compound of this class to date has been U-47700 (trans-3,4-dichloro-N-[2-(dimethylamino)cyclohexyl]-N-methylbenzamide), reported by users to give short-lasting euphoric effects and a desire to re-dose. Since U-47700 was internationally controlled in 2017, a range of related compounds with similar chemical structures, adapted from the original patented compounds, have appeared on the illicit drugs market. Interest in a structurally unrelated opioid developed by the Upjohn Company and now known as BDPC/bromadol appears to be increasing and should be closely monitored. Conclusions: International early warning systems are an essential part of tracking emerging psychoactive substances and allow responsive action to be taken to facilitate the gathering of relevant data for detailed risk assessments. Pre-emptive research on the most likely compounds to emerge next, so providing drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic data to ensure that new substances are detected early in toxicological samples is recommended. As these compounds are chiral compounds and stereochemistry has a large effect on their potency, it is recommended that detection methods consider the determination of configuration. [1] |
Solubility Data
| Solubility (In Vitro) | May dissolve in DMSO (in most cases), if not, try other solvents such as H2O, Ethanol, or DMF with a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples |
| Solubility (In Vivo) |
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples. Injection Formulations (e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC) Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80: Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline) *Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 :Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil) Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)] *Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution. Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10: 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil) Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300:Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline) Oral Formulations Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400 Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.  (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.) |
| Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
| 1 mM | 2.7076 mL | 13.5380 mL | 27.0761 mL | |
| 5 mM | 0.5415 mL | 2.7076 mL | 5.4152 mL | |
| 10 mM | 0.2708 mL | 1.3538 mL | 2.7076 mL |