| Bioactivity | MDA 19 is a potent and selective agonist of human cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2), with a Ki of 43.3 nM. MDA 19 has antiallodynic effects in a rat model of neuropathic pain and does not affect rat locomotor activity[1][2]. | ||||||||||||
| Invitro | MDA19 displayed 4-fold-higher affinity at the human CB(2) than at the human CB1 receptor (K(i) = 43.3 +/- 10.3 vs 162.4 +/- 7.6 nM) and nearly 70-fold-higher affinity at the rat CB2 than at the rat CB1 receptor (K(i) = 16.3 +/- 2.1 vs 1130 +/- 574 nM). In guanosine triphosphate (GTP)gamma[(35)S] functional assays, MDA19 behaved as an agonist at the human CB1 and CB2 receptors and at the rat CB1 receptor but as an inverse agonist at the rat CB2 receptor. In 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) assays, MDA19 behaved as an agonist at the rat CB1 receptor and exhibited no functional activity at the rat CB(2) receptor. In extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 activation assays. | ||||||||||||
| In Vivo | MDA19 behaved as an agonist at the rat CB2 receptor. MDA19 attenuated tactile allodynia produced by spinal nerve ligation or paclitaxel in a dose-related manner in rats and CB2(+/+) mice but not in CB2(-/-) mice, indicating that CB2 receptors mediated the effects of MDA19. MDA19 did not affect rat locomotor activity. | ||||||||||||
| Name | MDA 19 | ||||||||||||
| CAS | 1048973-47-2 | ||||||||||||
| Formula | C21H23N3O2 | ||||||||||||
| Molar Mass | 349.43 | ||||||||||||
| Appearance | Solid | ||||||||||||
| Transport | Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere. | ||||||||||||
| Storage |
|
||||||||||||
| Reference | [1]. Diaz, Philippe; Xu, Jijun; Astruc-Diaz, Fanny et al. Design and Synthesis of a Novel Series of N-Alkyl Isatin Acylhydrazone Derivatives that Act as Selective Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Agonists for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Journal of Medicinal Chemi [2]. Xu JJ, Diaz P, Astruc-Diaz F et al. Pharmacological characterization of a novel cannabinoid ligand, MDA19, for treatment of neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):99-109. |