 Chemical Structure.png)
Azeliragon 2HCl (formerly TTP-488 dihydrochloride; PF04494700) is an orally bioactive RAGE (Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products) inhibitor that has the potential for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD/Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. RAGE is a pattern recognition receptor that affects the movement of amyloid (a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease) into the brain. In preclinical studies, azeliragon decreased brain amyloid in mice and improved their performance on behavior tests. Azeliragon has been shown to be involved in adaptive immune responses. It is currently in Phase 3 clinical trial.
Physicochemical Properties
| Molecular Formula | C32H40CL3N3O2 | |
| Molecular Weight | 605.14 | |
| Exact Mass | 603.218 | |
| Elemental Analysis | C, 63.52; H, 6.66; Cl, 17.58; N, 6.95; O, 5.29 | |
| CAS # | 1284150-65-7 | |
| Related CAS # | 1284150-65-7 (2HCl);603148-36-3; | |
| PubChem CID | 67202797 | |
| Appearance | Typically exists as solid at room temperature | |
| Hydrogen Bond Donor Count | 2 | |
| Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count | 4 | |
| Rotatable Bond Count | 14 | |
| Heavy Atom Count | 40 | |
| Complexity | 626 | |
| Defined Atom Stereocenter Count | 0 | |
| SMILES | ClC1C=CC(=CC=1)OC1C=CC(=CC=1)N1C=C(C2C=CC(=CC=2)OCCCN(CC)CC)N=C1CCCC.Cl.Cl |
|
| InChi Key | CQAGJWKITXAOAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N | |
| InChi Code | InChI=1S/C32H38ClN3O2.2ClH/c1-4-7-9-32-34-31(25-10-16-28(17-11-25)37-23-8-22-35(5-2)6-3)24-36(32)27-14-20-30(21-15-27)38-29-18-12-26(33)13-19-29;;/h10-21,24H,4-9,22-23H2,1-3H3;2*1H | |
| Chemical Name | 3-[4-[2-butyl-1-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)phenyl]imidazol-4-yl]phenoxy]-N,N-diethylpropan-1-amine;dihydrochloride | |
| Synonyms |
|
|
| HS Tariff Code | 2934.99.9001 | |
| Storage |
Powder-20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month |
|
| Shipping Condition | Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs) |
Biological Activity
| Targets | RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products) | |
| ln Vitro |
|
|
| ln Vivo |
|
|
| Enzyme Assay | Using serum from uremic pigs with chronic renal insufficiency, our results show that KLF2 expression is suppressed by the uremic milieu and individual uremic solutes in vitro. Specifically, KLF2 expression is significantly decreased in human umbilical vein endothelial cells after treatment with uremic porcine serum or carboxymethyllysine‐modified albumin, an advanced glycation end product (AGE) known to induce endothelial dysfunction. AGE‐mediated suppression of KLF2 is dependent on activation of the receptor for AGE, as measured by small interfering RNA knockdown of the receptor for AGE. Furthermore, KLF2 suppression promotes endothelial dysfunction, because adenoviral overexpression of KLF2 inhibits reactive oxygen species production and leukocyte adhesion in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. In addition, the application of hemodynamic shear stress, prolonged serum dialysis, or treatment with the receptor for AGE antagonist azeliragon (TTP488) is sufficient to prevent KLF2 suppression in vitro. [4] | |
| Cell Assay |
Cell Viability Assay[3] Cell Types: Purified T cells from RAGE-/- or WT B6 mice. Tested Concentrations: 4 nM Incubation Duration: 16 hrs (hours) Experimental Results: Inhibited of WT but not RAGE-/- T cells, and Dramatically decreased the level of IFN-γ. |
|
| Animal Protocol |
Animal/Disease Models: Prediabetic NOD/LtJ (6-7 week old) mice, NOD mice with spontaneous diabetes, WT balb/c (Bagg ALBino) mouse (8-10 week old ) and B6 mice with diabetes [3]. Doses: 100 mcg/d Route of Administration: intraperitoneal (ip)injection; every day Experimental Results: Prolonged islet auto and allograft survival. |
|
| References |
[1]. Targeting the Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts (RAGE): A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective. J Med Chem. 2017 Sep 14;60(17):7213-7232. [2]. Assessment of Azeliragon QTc Liability Through Integrated, Model-Based Concentration QTc Analysis. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2019 May;8(4):426-435. [3]. RAGE ligation affects T cell activation and controls T cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2008 Sep 15;181(6):4272-8. |
|
| Additional Infomation |
Azeliragon is an orally bioavailable inhibitor of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), with potential antineoplastic activity. Upon oral administration, azeliragon targets and binds to RAGE, thereby preventing binding of RAGE ligands to RAGE, and prevents RAGE-mediated signaling, This may inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of tumor cells in which the RAGE pathway is overactivated. RAGE, a receptor belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily, plays a key role in inflammation and is overexpressed in a variety of cancers. It plays a key role in tumor cell proliferation, survival and metastasis. Azeliragon is an inhibitor of the receptor for advanced glycation end products being developed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The objective of the current analysis was to evaluate the relationship between plasma azeliragon concentrations and QT interval. Simultaneous QT values and plasma concentrations were available from 711 subjects (6236 records), pooled from 5 studies in healthy volunteers, 2 studies in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, and 1 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent albuminuria. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was conducted to describe azeliragon concentration-related changes in QT interval, after correcting for heart rate, using Fridericia's criteria (QTcF) and sex-related differences in baseline QTcF. Azeliragon-related changes in QTcF were predicted using 2 methods: simulation and bias-corrected 90% confidence interval approaches. A small positive relationship between azeliragon plasma concentration and QTcF was noted with a slope of 0.059 ms/ng/mL. Simulations predicted mean (90% prediction interval) changes in QTcF of 0.733 milliseconds (0.32-1.66 milliseconds) with the phase 3 dose (5 mg once daily steady state) and 4.32 milliseconds (1.7-8.74 milliseconds) at supratherapeutic doses (20 mg once daily steady state or 60 mg once daily × 6 days). Bias-corrected upper 90% confidence intervals for therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses were 0.88 and 5.01 milliseconds, respectively. Model-based analysis showed a small, nonclinically meaningful, positive relationship between azeliragon plasma concentration and QTcF with a slope close to zero. Neither the prediction interval nor the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval reached 10 milliseconds, demonstrating no clinically meaningful drug-related effect on QTcF at expected therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of azeliragon.[1] The receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is an ubiquitous, transmembrane, immunoglobulin-like receptor that exists in multiple isoforms and binds to a diverse range of endogenous extracellular ligands and intracellular effectors. Ligand binding at the extracellular domain of RAGE initiates a complex intracellular signaling cascade, resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), immunoinflammatory effects, cellular proliferation, or apoptosis with concomitant upregulation of RAGE itself. To date, research has mainly focused on the correlation between RAGE activity and pathological conditions, such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegeneration. Because RAGE plays a role in many pathological disorders, it has become an attractive target for the development of inhibitors at the extracellular and intracellular domains. This review describes the role of endogenous RAGE ligands/effectors in normo- and pathophysiological processes, summarizes the current status of exogenous small-molecule inhibitors of RAGE and concludes by identifying key strategies for future therapeutic intervention.[2] The pattern recognition receptor, RAGE, has been shown to be involved in adaptive immune responses but its role on the components of these responses is not well understood. We have studied the effects of a small molecule inhibitor of RAGE and the deletion of the receptor (RAGE-/- mice) on T cell responses involved in autoimmunity and allograft rejection. Syngeneic islet graft and islet allograft rejection was reduced in NOD and B6 mice treated with TTP488, a small molecule RAGE inhibitor (p < 0.001). RAGE-/- mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes showed delayed rejection of islet allografts compared with wild type (WT) mice (p < 0.02). This response in vivo correlated with reduced proliferative responses of RAGE-/- T cells in MLRs and in WT T cells cultured with TTP488. Overall T cell proliferation following activation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAbs were similar in RAGE-/- and WT cells, but RAGE-/- T cells did not respond to costimulation with anti-CD28 mAb. Furthermore, culture supernatants from cultures with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAbs showed higher levels of IL-10, IL-5, and TNF-alpha with RAGE-/- compared with WT T cells, and WT T cells showed reduced production of IFN-gamma in the presence of TTP488, suggesting that RAGE may be important in the differentiation of T cell subjects. Indeed, by real-time PCR, we found higher levels of RAGE mRNA expression on clonal T cells activated under Th1 differentiating conditions. We conclude that activation of RAGE on T cells is involved in early events that lead to differentiation of Th1(+) T cells.[3] |
Solubility Data
| Solubility (In Vitro) |
|
|||
| Solubility (In Vivo) |
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples. Injection Formulations (e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC) Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80： Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline) *Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 ：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil) Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)] *Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C，1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution. Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10： 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil) Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline) Oral Formulations Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400 Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently. (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.) |
| Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
| 1 mM | 1.6525 mL | 8.2626 mL | 16.5251 mL | |
| 5 mM | 0.3305 mL | 1.6525 mL | 3.3050 mL | |
| 10 mM | 0.1653 mL | 0.8263 mL | 1.6525 mL |